Proactive vs Retroactive Interference Flashcards
Practice 42 original English flashcards on memory interference: both directions, target and competitor checks, paired scenarios, and missing-evidence decisions.
Tentang dek ini
Practice proactive and retroactive interference with 42 original English flashcards for introductory psychology. Each classifiable case states when the material was learned, what the person is trying to recall, and which competing memory blocks it. These are simplified hypothetical situations: use the obstruction stated in the prompt. An ordinary error or episode of forgetting alone does not establish its cause.
The cards practice term-to-direction definitions, direction-to-term recall, scenario-to-label decisions, and identifying the target or competing memory. Eight separated scenario pairs switch the requested target while keeping the same learning chronology. Six component checks, eight claim repairs, and six evidence checks help catch reversed labels and conclusions drawn from missing information. Some cases use changed rules; others use two associations that remain valid.
The sequence introduces the two directions, the target, and acquisition order before mixing applications, reverse recall, repairs, and evidence checks. Each paired scenario has at least five unrelated cards between its two forms. Answers put the result first and give a short reason. Every card uses the memory-interference tag; the review scheduler handles longer-term spacing after installation.
Arbitrary label-to-example prompts are omitted because many examples would be correct. Famous-study trivia, detailed neuroscience, clinical diagnosis or treatment, and broad memory-theory coverage are outside this focused deck. No exam or complete-course alignment is claimed. For a longer explanation, read the proactive vs retroactive interference lesson.
The questions, scenarios, answers, organization, and metadata were written independently with AI assistance and checked against reference facts. No competitor cards, textbook examples, examination questions, source prose, or diagrams were copied. Factual references are the APA Dictionary entries for proactive interference, retroactive interference, and interference, plus Jeffrey C. Levy's Memory chapter in Psychology, published under CC BY 4.0. The reference works retain their own rights; facts are not claimed as proprietary.
Original material, including the AI-generated decorative cover, is dedicated under CC0 1.0 to the extent applicable rights exist. This is independent study material without institutional endorsement.
Kartu dalam dek ini
Kartu 1
Pertanyaan
Proactive interference: which learning hinders which memory?
Jawaban
Earlier learning hinders learning or recalling later material. The competing material was acquired first.
Kartu 2
Pertanyaan
In a memory-interference case, what is the target memory?
Jawaban
The information the person is trying to learn or recall. Identify it before deciding the interference direction.
Kartu 3
Pertanyaan
Retroactive interference: which learning hinders which memory?
Jawaban
Later learning hinders recalling earlier material. The competing material was acquired after the target.
Kartu 4
Pertanyaan
In proactive and retroactive interference, what makes a memory earlier or later?
Jawaban
When the material was learned. The time of its most recent recall does not set its acquisition order.
Kartu 5
Pertanyaan
Eli first learned that a blue badge means the Pine hiking club, then that it means the Tower chess club in a different badge system. Both remain valid. Asked for the hiking club, Tower keeps intruding and blocks recall of Pine. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later chess association hinders recall of the earlier hiking association.
Kartu 6
Pertanyaan
A grower first learned that tray K held basil, then learned it had been replanted with mint. Asked what tray K holds now, the basil memory intrudes and blocks recall of mint. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. Earlier basil learning hinders recall of the later mint information.
Kartu 7
Pertanyaan
Nora learned a shop's old closing bell, then its replacement bell. Nothing is said about whether either memory makes the other harder to recall. Is interference established?
Jawaban
No; the blocking relationship is missing. Two learned items alone do not show that either one interferes with the other.
Kartu 8
Pertanyaan
What is the term for earlier learning hindering recall of later-learned material?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The hindering memory was acquired before the requested material.
Kartu 9
Pertanyaan
Leah first learned to finish a dish with parsley, then learned a revised version with dill. Asked for the revised version, the parsley instruction keeps intruding and blocks recall. What is the target memory?
Jawaban
The revised instruction to use dill. It is the information Leah is asked to recall; parsley is the competitor.
Kartu 10
Pertanyaan
A pupil learned the kite symbol's meaning on Monday and the leaf symbol's meaning on Tuesday. On Wednesday the pupil recalled kite. Repair: 'Kite is now the later-learned memory.'
Jawaban
Kite remains the earlier-learned memory. Recalling it on Wednesday does not change when it was originally acquired.
Kartu 11
Pertanyaan
Mika first learned a paint mix with two spoonfuls of white, then a revised mix with four. Asked for the earlier mix, the four-spoon instruction intrudes and blocks recall. Which learned instruction is the competitor?
Jawaban
The later instruction to use four spoonfuls of white. It obstructs the requested earlier mix.
Kartu 12
Pertanyaan
What is the term for later learning hindering recall of earlier-learned material?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The hindering material was acquired after the requested material.
Kartu 13
Pertanyaan
A volunteer first learned that cloths go in the low cabinet, then learned the new rule placing them in the tall cabinet. Asked for the new location, the low-cabinet memory intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier location hinders recall of the later location.
Kartu 14
Pertanyaan
Rae first learned that the matinee opens with a flute cue, then that the evening show opens with a drum cue. Both cues remain correct for their shows. Asked for the evening cue, the flute cue intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier matinee association hinders recall of the later evening association.
Kartu 15
Pertanyaan
Repair this rule: 'If a memory-interference prompt mentions an old memory, the answer must be retroactive.'
Jawaban
The label depends on which memory obstructs which target. An earlier memory blocking a later target is proactive; a later memory blocking an earlier target is retroactive.
Kartu 16
Pertanyaan
A clerk first learned to mark completed forms with a dot, then learned a replacement rule using a tick. Asked how forms were marked under the earlier rule, the tick instruction intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later tick rule hinders recall of the earlier dot rule.
Kartu 17
Pertanyaan
A singer first learned to start a song softly, then learned a revised arrangement with a loud start. Asked for the earlier arrangement, the loud start keeps intruding and blocks recall. What is the target memory?
Jawaban
The earlier instruction to start softly. The requested arrangement sets the target, even though another arrangement was learned later.
Kartu 18
Pertanyaan
A grower first learned that tray K held basil, then learned it had been replanted with mint. Asked what tray K held before replanting, the mint memory intrudes and blocks recall of basil. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. Later mint learning hinders recall of the earlier basil information.
Kartu 19
Pertanyaan
Kai learned two associations for a star emblem: Cedar team and Harbor team. Asked for Cedar, Harbor intrudes and blocks recall. The account does not say which association was learned first. Can the direction be classified?
Jawaban
Not from this account; acquisition order is missing. The target and competitor are clear, but their earlier/later relationship is unknown.
Kartu 20
Pertanyaan
Repair this claim: 'Proactive interference is decided by which response comes to mind first during the test.'
Jawaban
Proactive interference is decided by earlier learning obstructing later material. The order in which responses come to mind during a test does not define the label.
Kartu 21
Pertanyaan
Sam first learned to stamp bowls before glazing, then learned a revised studio procedure stamping after glazing. Asked for the earlier procedure, the after-glazing instruction intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later procedure hinders recall of the earlier procedure.
Kartu 22
Pertanyaan
A maker first learned that the sample called Dawn is wool, then that the sample called Dusk is cotton. Asked for Dusk's fabric, the wool association intrudes and blocks recall of cotton. Which memory is the competitor?
Jawaban
The earlier association between Dawn and wool. It obstructs recall of the requested Dusk association.
Kartu 23
Pertanyaan
A helper first learned that bread deliveries arrive on Tuesday, then learned that the schedule changed to Friday. Asked for the current day, Tuesday intrudes and blocks recall of Friday. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier Tuesday schedule hinders recall of the later Friday schedule.
Kartu 24
Pertanyaan
Eli first learned that a blue badge means the Pine hiking club, then that it means the Tower chess club in a different badge system. Both remain valid. Asked for the chess club, Pine keeps intruding and blocks recall of Tower. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier hiking association hinders recall of the later chess association.
Kartu 25
Pertanyaan
A dancer first learned a left-step ending, then a revised right-step ending. Asked for the earlier ending, the right step intrudes and blocks recall. Repair: 'This is proactive because the left step is old.'
Jawaban
This is retroactive interference. The later right-step learning obstructs the requested earlier left-step ending.
Kartu 26
Pertanyaan
Jo first learned that a circle token means rest in a travel game, then that it means swap in a puzzle game. Both meanings remain valid in their games. Asked for the travel-game meaning, swap intrudes and blocks recall of rest. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later puzzle-game association hinders recall of the earlier travel-game association.
Kartu 27
Pertanyaan
A student first learned that a triangle marks a campsite on one map key, then that a triangle marks a lookout on another. Asked for the second map's meaning, campsite intrudes and blocks recall. What is the target memory?
Jawaban
The second map's association between triangle and lookout. The requested map key identifies the target.
Kartu 28
Pertanyaan
A volunteer first learned that cloths go in the low cabinet, then learned the new rule placing them in the tall cabinet. Asked for the earlier location, the tall-cabinet memory intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later location hinders recall of the earlier location.
Kartu 29
Pertanyaan
A learner first learned Elm for a square symbol, then Bay for the same symbol in another chart. The account says the associations interfere but never specifies which chart's meaning is being recalled. Can you assign one direction?
Jawaban
Not from this account; the requested target is missing. You need to know which association obstructs recall of which other association.
Kartu 30
Pertanyaan
Rae first learned that the matinee opens with a flute cue, then that the evening show opens with a drum cue. Both cues remain correct for their shows. Asked for the matinee cue, the drum cue intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later evening association hinders recall of the earlier matinee association.
Kartu 31
Pertanyaan
Repair this claim: 'Forgetting something learned yesterday proves retroactive interference.'
Jawaban
Forgetting alone does not prove retroactive interference. You need evidence that later-learned material hinders recall of that earlier target.
Kartu 32
Pertanyaan
A packer first learned to fold a label inward, then a replacement method folding it outward. Asked for the new method, the inward fold intrudes and blocks recall. Which learned method is the competitor?
Jawaban
The earlier inward-fold method. It obstructs recall of the later outward-fold method.
Kartu 33
Pertanyaan
A clerk first learned to mark completed forms with a dot, then learned a replacement rule using a tick. Asked how forms are marked under the new rule, the dot instruction intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier dot rule hinders recall of the later tick rule.
Kartu 34
Pertanyaan
A visitor never heard or learned the name of an exhibit. Asked for its name, the visitor cannot give it. Does this establish proactive or retroactive interference?
Jawaban
Neither direction is established. There is no learned target memory in the account, so the failure does not demonstrate one memory blocking another.
Kartu 35
Pertanyaan
Repair this claim: 'Retroactive interference means earlier learning blocks recall of later learning.'
Jawaban
Retroactive interference means later learning blocks recall of earlier learning. The claimed direction was reversed.
Kartu 36
Pertanyaan
Sam first learned to stamp bowls before glazing, then learned a revised studio procedure stamping after glazing. Asked for the revised procedure, the before-glazing instruction intrudes and blocks recall. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier procedure hinders recall of the later procedure.
Kartu 37
Pertanyaan
A baker first learned a round-loaf pattern, then an oval-loaf pattern. Asked for each in turn, the baker recalls both accurately and without difficulty; neither memory obstructs the other. Which interference direction is shown here?
Jawaban
Neither. This account explicitly describes successful recall without obstruction, so it shows neither proactive nor retroactive interference.
Kartu 38
Pertanyaan
Repair this claim: 'Proactive or retroactive interference requires the competing fact to have become false.'
Jawaban
Both facts can remain valid. Interference concerns one learned association obstructing the requested other association, with direction set by acquisition order.
Kartu 39
Pertanyaan
A helper first learned that bread deliveries arrive on Tuesday, then learned that the schedule changed to Friday. Asked for the former delivery day, Friday intrudes and blocks recall of Tuesday. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Retroactive interference. The later Friday schedule hinders recall of the earlier Tuesday schedule.
Kartu 40
Pertanyaan
Repair this claim: 'Learning two similar facts automatically establishes memory interference.'
Jawaban
Interference also requires one learned item to hinder learning or recall of the other. Similarity and two learning events alone do not establish that relationship.
Kartu 41
Pertanyaan
Jo first learned that a circle token means rest in a travel game, then that it means swap in a puzzle game. Both meanings remain valid in their games. Asked for the puzzle-game meaning, rest intrudes and blocks recall of swap. Which interference direction?
Jawaban
Proactive interference. The earlier travel-game association hinders recall of the later puzzle-game association.
Kartu 42
Pertanyaan
A pupil first learned a red flag for Group A, then a green flag for Group B. Asked for Group B's flag, the pupil says red. Nothing establishes why the answer was wrong. Is proactive interference proved?
Jawaban
No; the cause of the error is not established. Red matches earlier learning, but the account does not show that this memory obstructed recall of green.
42 kartu
Proactive vs Retroactive Interference Flashcards
Nibomo akan terbuka agar Anda bisa mulai belajar.