Bayes’ Theorem Flashcards: Base Rates & Evidence Updates
Practice 48 original Bayes theorem flashcards: build source-and-evidence weights, normalize across all sources, repair base-rate mistakes, and check sequential updates.
Sellest kaardipakist
A signal can be common for one source without making that source likely after the signal. These 48 original Bayes theorem flashcards help you keep the source share, source-specific likelihood, total evidence, and posterior separate.
Start with priors and likelihoods. Then calculate prior × likelihood branch weights for fictional bags, batches, routes, and sensors; add every possible source branch to get the evidence total; and normalize the requested source weight. Two-source updates lead into three-source comparisons and subset posteriors. Short repair prompts target reversed conditions, missing priors or branches, the wrong complement, and branch weights mistaken for posteriors. Six cards handle sequential evidence, including when conditional independence permits multiplication and when a repeated display supplies no new observation.
The sequence introduces each prerequisite before its dependent calculation, then interleaves calculations, interpretations, and repairs. Related variants are spaced so one answer does not directly cue the next; the app’s scheduler handles later review spacing. Each card gives the model assumptions it needs and an explained answer.
This is a focused introductory probability set, not a full statistics or exam course. It avoids two-way-table count drills already covered by the separate conditional-probability deck, mechanical reverse calculations that cannot recover unknown inputs, continuous Bayesian models, odds-form algebra, medical and financial decisions, and claims about real-world sources from toy assumptions. All examples, wording, order, and cover are original. Mathematical facts were checked against NIST’s Engineering Statistics Handbook and MIT OCW’s probability lecture; their prose, exercises, and figures were not copied. AI assisted drafting, followed by individual factual and numerical review. The CC0 label covers only the original expression and generated artwork to the extent rights exist.
Selle kaardipaki kaardid
Kaart 1
Küsimus
For a Bayes update over hidden sources, what must the listed sources cover?
Vastus
Every possible source, exactly once. The sources must be exhaustive and mutually exclusive so their evidence branches can be added.
Kaart 2
Küsimus
Before seeing a result, a token comes from bag A with probability 0.3. What is 0.3 called in a Bayes update?
Vastus
The prior for bag A. It is A’s source probability before the result is observed.
Kaart 3
Küsimus
A token from bag A is blue with probability 0.8. In a Bayes update after seeing blue, what role does 0.8 play?
Vastus
The likelihood of blue given A. It is P(blue | A), not the chance that a blue token came from A.
Kaart 4
Küsimus
An observed signal can come from every possible source. What probability belongs in the denominator of a source posterior?
Vastus
The total probability of the signal. Add its prior × likelihood branch weight across all possible sources.
Kaart 5
Küsimus
Only bags A and B can be chosen. P(A) = 0.3 and P(red | A) = 0.8. What is the joint weight for A and red?
Vastus
0.24. Multiply 0.3 × 0.8; this is P(A and red), before normalization.
Kaart 6
Küsimus
A bag yields blue with probability 0.8. A learner calls 0.8 the chance the bag was chosen after seeing blue. What is the mistake?
Vastus
The condition was reversed. 0.8 is P(blue | bag); P(bag | blue) also needs source priors and the other bags’ blue rates.
Kaart 7
Küsimus
Only batches A and B supply parts. Their shares are 0.25 and 0.75; a part is marked with probabilities 0.6 and 0.2, respectively. What is P(marked)?
Vastus
0.30. Add both marked branches: 0.25 × 0.6 + 0.75 × 0.2 = 0.15 + 0.15.
Kaart 8
Küsimus
A source makes 70% of its tokens striped and supplies 20% of all tokens. A learner uses 0.70 as its striped branch weight. What factor is missing?
Vastus
The 0.20 prior. Its striped branch weight is 0.20 × 0.70 = 0.14.
Kaart 9
Küsimus
Only routes A and B are possible. Their priors are 0.4 and 0.6; P(chime | A) = 0.9 and P(chime | B) = 0.1. After a chime, what is P(A | chime)?
Vastus
6/7. A contributes 0.36; both routes contribute 0.36 + 0.06 = 0.42. Divide 0.36/0.42.
Kaart 10
Küsimus
Only A and B exist. A learner divides A’s bell branch weight by itself and calls the result P(A | bell). What denominator term is missing?
Vastus
P(B)P(bell | B). The bell denominator must include B’s branch too, if B can produce a bell.
Kaart 11
Küsimus
Only bins A and B exist. A’s share rises from 0.1 to 0.4 while P(glow | A) = 0.8 and P(glow | B) = 0.2 stay fixed. Does P(A | glow) rise or fall?
Vastus
It rises. The posterior changes from 4/13 to 8/11 because the prior for A increased with both likelihoods fixed.
Kaart 12
Küsimus
Only sources A, B, and C exist. Their priors are 0.2, 0.3, 0.5; their beep rates are 0.5, 0.4, 0.2. What is P(beep)?
Vastus
0.32. Add every branch: 0.10 + 0.12 + 0.10.
Kaart 13
Küsimus
For a source A, a learner uses P(A) × P(A) × P(glow | A) as its glow branch weight. What is the correction?
Vastus
Use the prior once. The branch weight is P(A) × P(glow | A).
Kaart 14
Küsimus
Only sources A and B exist. A supplies 35% of items. What prior belongs on B’s branch?
Vastus
65%. The two source shares must add to 100%.
Kaart 15
Küsimus
After a red result, the only three source-and-red weights are A: 0.12, B: 0.08, C: 0.20. What is P(A | red)?
Vastus
0.3. The total red weight is 0.40, so normalize A’s 0.12/0.40.
Kaart 16
Küsimus
Only A and B are equally likely. Given each source, two new signals are independent. Their likelihoods are 0.8 and 0.6 under A, and 0.2 and 0.3 under B. After both signals, what is P(A | both)?
Vastus
8/9. Joint weights are 0.5 × 0.8 × 0.6 = 0.24 for A and 0.5 × 0.2 × 0.3 = 0.03 for B.
Kaart 17
Küsimus
Only routes North and South exist. North is used 70% of the time, and P(late | North) = 10%. What is the North-and-late branch weight?
Vastus
7%. Multiply 70% × 10%; it is not the posterior P(North | late).
Kaart 18
Küsimus
Sources A, B, C have priors 0.1, 0.3, 0.6 and signal likelihoods 0.9, 0.5, 0.4. Which source has the largest signal branch weight?
Vastus
C. The weights are 0.09, 0.15, and 0.24; A has the largest likelihood but not the largest contribution.
Kaart 19
Küsimus
A model gives signal rates for sources A and B but says a third source may exist, without its share or signal rate. Can P(A | signal) be determined?
Vastus
No. The evidence total needs every possible source branch; an unmodelled source leaves the denominator incomplete.
Kaart 20
Küsimus
Only sources Z and Y are possible. Their priors are 0.3 and 0.7; P(ring | Z) = 0.4 and P(ring | Y) = 0.1. After a ring, what is P(Z | ring)?
Vastus
12/19. The branch weights are 0.12 and 0.07; normalize Z’s weight by 0.19.
Kaart 21
Küsimus
Only machines A and B produce tokens. Their shares are 0.6 and 0.4, and their stripe rates are 0.25 and 0.5. What is P(stripe)?
Vastus
0.35. Add 0.6 × 0.25 and 0.4 × 0.5, giving 0.15 + 0.20.
Kaart 22
Küsimus
After a pulse, the only source-and-pulse weights are A: 0.10, B: 0.20, C: 0.30. What is P(A or B | pulse)?
Vastus
0.5. A and B contribute 0.30 of the total 0.60 pulse weight.
Kaart 23
Küsimus
After one observation, P(A | first result) = 0.7. A genuinely new second result arrives. What prior for A enters the next conditional update?
Vastus
0.7. The first posterior becomes the starting probability for the new evidence; its likelihood still needs a model.
Kaart 24
Küsimus
After a click, the only branch weights are A: 0.10 and B: 0.30. A learner says P(A | click) = 0.75. What is the corrected value?
Vastus
0.25. Normalize A’s weight, 0.10/(0.10 + 0.30); 0.75 belongs to B.
Kaart 25
Küsimus
Only bags A and B are possible. Their priors are 0.2 and 0.8; P(star | A) = 0.75 and P(star | B) = 0.25. After seeing a star, what is P(A | star)?
Vastus
3/7. A’s star weight is 0.15 and total star weight is 0.15 + 0.20 = 0.35.
Kaart 26
Küsimus
Only sources A, B, C have priors 0.25, 0.25, 0.5 and tick likelihoods 0.4, 0.2, 0.3. A proposed P(tick) is 0.15 because it omits C. What is the corrected P(tick)?
Vastus
0.30. Add C’s 0.5 × 0.3 = 0.15 to the A and B weights, 0.10 + 0.05.
Kaart 27
Küsimus
Only A and B exist and their priors are known. P(ping | A) is known, but P(ping | B) is missing. Is P(A | ping) uniquely determined?
Vastus
No. B’s unknown ping contribution changes the denominator.
Kaart 28
Küsimus
Only A and B make tiles. P(A) = 0.2, P(B) = 0.8, and P(star | A) = 0.7. A learner uses 0.8 × 0.7 for A’s star branch. What is A’s correct branch weight?
Vastus
0.14. A’s prior is 0.2, so multiply 0.2 × 0.7. The 0.8 prior belongs to B.
Kaart 29
Küsimus
A learner wants P(not A | ring) but subtracts P(A | no ring) from 1. Which probability should be subtracted from 1?
Vastus
P(A | ring). Keep the observed condition fixed when taking the source complement.
Kaart 30
Küsimus
After a stripe, the only three source-and-stripe weights are A: 0.06, B: 0.09, C: 0.15. What is P(C | stripe)?
Vastus
0.5. Divide C’s 0.15 by the total 0.30.
Kaart 31
Küsimus
A sensor result appears twice because the screen refreshed; no second measurement occurred. Should a Bayes update use the same result twice?
Vastus
No. A duplicated display supplies no new evidence. Updating twice would count one observation twice.
Kaart 32
Küsimus
Only A and B exist. P(A) = 0.1, P(B) = 0.9, P(chime | A) = 0.9, and P(chime | B) = 0.4. A learner chooses A as more likely after a chime because 0.9 > 0.4. Which source is actually more likely?
Vastus
B. The chime weights are A: 0.09 and B: 0.36; priors change the comparison.
Kaart 33
Küsimus
Only boxes A and B exist. P(A) = 0.3, and both boxes yield a square token with probability 0.4. After seeing a square, what is P(A | square)?
Vastus
0.3. Equal likelihoods leave the prior unchanged: 0.3 × 0.4 / 0.4 = 0.3.
Kaart 34
Küsimus
Three mutually exclusive sources cover every possibility. After observing a flash with positive probability, what must their three posterior probabilities sum to?
Vastus
1. Normalization divides every source-and-flash weight by the same positive total.
Kaart 35
Küsimus
Two signals are independent overall, but their dependence given each hidden source is unknown. Can their source-specific likelihoods safely be multiplied?
Vastus
No. Multiplication for a source needs independence conditional on that source, or a supplied joint likelihood.
Kaart 36
Küsimus
After a pulse, the only two source-and-pulse weights are 0.40 and 0.10. A learner reports the first source’s posterior as 0.40. What is it?
Vastus
0.8. Divide 0.40 by the total pulse weight 0.50; a branch weight is not yet a posterior.
Kaart 37
Küsimus
Only trays A and B exist and are equally likely. Their dot rates are 0.6 and 0.3. After seeing a dot, what is P(A | dot)?
Vastus
2/3. The weights are 0.30 and 0.15; A contributes 0.30/0.45.
Kaart 38
Küsimus
Only sensors A, B, C are possible. Their priors are 0.5, 0.3, 0.2 and ping likelihoods are 0.1, 0.4, 0.5. After a ping, what is P(C | ping)?
Vastus
10/27. C contributes 0.10; all sources contribute 0.05 + 0.12 + 0.10 = 0.27.
Kaart 39
Küsimus
A model assigns an observed flash probability of zero across every possible source. Is P(A | flash) defined by the ordinary Bayes ratio?
Vastus
No. Its denominator P(flash) is zero, so the conditional probability is undefined in this discrete model.
Kaart 40
Küsimus
Only sources A and B exist. A supplies 5% of items; P(flash | A) = 0.9 and P(flash | B) = 0.1. What is P(flash)?
Vastus
0.14. Add 0.05 × 0.9 and 0.95 × 0.1, giving 0.045 + 0.095.
Kaart 41
Küsimus
Only A, B, C have priors 0.1, 0.4, 0.5 and mark likelihoods 0.9, 0.1, 0.1. Which source is most probable after a mark?
Vastus
A. Its weight 0.09 exceeds B’s 0.04 and C’s 0.05, despite A’s smallest prior.
Kaart 42
Küsimus
Signals are independent given source A, but nothing is stated about their dependence given source B. Can both sources’ two-signal branch weights be built by multiplying separate likelihoods?
Vastus
No. The B branch still needs P(both signals | B) or conditional independence given B.
Kaart 43
Küsimus
A proposed evidence total adds source A, source B, and a third label that includes every B item. What is the structural error?
Vastus
B is counted twice. The branches used in a total must be disjoint and cover all possible sources.
Kaart 44
Küsimus
An observed click has branch weights 0.12 from source A and 0.18 from source B; A and B are the only sources. What is P(A | click)?
Vastus
0.4. Normalize A’s weight: 0.12/(0.12 + 0.18).
Kaart 45
Küsimus
After a glow, the only source-and-glow weights are A: 0.08, B: 0.12, C: 0.20. What is P(not C | glow)?
Vastus
0.5. A and B contribute 0.20 of the 0.40 total; the complement is taken after conditioning on glow.
Kaart 46
Küsimus
A classroom model assigns fixed bag shares and color rates. Does a posterior computed from it establish the source of a real token outside that model?
Vastus
No. The result is conditional on the stipulated shares, rates, and source list; a real setting needs checked assumptions and data.
Kaart 47
Küsimus
Only sources A and B exist with priors 0.4 and 0.6. Supplied joint likelihoods for two signals are P(both | A) = 0.12 and P(both | B) = 0.24. What is P(A | both)?
Vastus
0.25. The weights are 0.4 × 0.12 = 0.048 and 0.6 × 0.24 = 0.144; divide 0.048 by 0.192.
Kaart 48
Küsimus
Only sources A and B exist. P(A) = 0.4, P(light | A) = 0.8, and P(light | B) = 0.3. After no light, what is P(A | no light)?
Vastus
4/25. No-light weights are 0.4 × 0.2 = 0.08 and 0.6 × 0.7 = 0.42; divide 0.08 by 0.50.
48 kaarti
Bayes’ Theorem Flashcards: Base Rates & Evidence Updates
Nibomo avaneb, et saaksid õppimist alustada.